Legitimation Inferences: An Additional Component for the Toulmin Model

Legitimation Inferences: An Additional Component for the Toulmin Model

Blog Article

This paper argues that the choice of backing to certify the authority of a warrant requires a legitimation inference.When brought into question, such an inference becomes a claim defended by showing sound reasons here for the selection of backing pertinent to a shared context.Legitimation controversies ensue when an attributed consensus meets objection.

It is argued that attention to legitimation controversies renders the Toulmin model a more useful critical paradigm for investigating the development and risks of communicative reasoning in a public forum.The nomination of John Tower as Secretary of Defense is employed to illustrate how critical analysis of legitimation controversies telemarkskongen flue reflexively expands the domain of inquiry for informal reasoning.